Igor Kolakovic
“Volleyball has long been a closed sport, as has gymnastics. Only those who played it could understand it, because of the complex rules, primarily in a technical sense.
Many rules have changed to bring volleyball closer to the spectators and young volleyball players, but for a long time, there have been no changes that will improve the game and prolong the action, which is certainly the goal, especially in men’s volleyball.
The revolution was brought about by a change from that boring volleyball when points were won only if you start the action with a service and it came to the point that today every action could win a point.
I will only mention some that existed while I was playing, which are from today’s perspective weird and a little stupid. For example, service can’t be received with fingers, underarms reception, if not almost ideal, was judged as a foul play. If an attack from the second line and the block touches the ball in that attack, the action continues even though the attacker commits a foul (stepped on the 3-meter line). Can you imagine?
Even today there are a lot of rules that I would change, which are ready for the changing. Volleyball goes ahead of its rules with its actions. Some of the current rules are killing volleyball. One rule just stings the eyes. It’s playing the second ball.
This rule is very irritating and is the subject of constant discussion in matches between coaches, players and referees.
It bothers me a lot when the referee decides to make a technical foul when trying to play the second ball. Today, the rules allow for the ball to be played with all parts of the body, to tolerate the first ball played in a technical sense, but I see no reason why the rule for the second ball played should not be changed.
I have long tolerated playing the second ball in training when we train situations 6 to 6. I am simply sorry that in this way I interrupt, often, a phenomenal action which in my opinion should end with the action of the players and not the referee’s decision. I keep telling the players that we are the avant-garde and that this rule will surely change because it is illogical… but it takes too long.
I don’t know what is gained by judging a technical foul (I don’t mean a retained ball) playing the second ball?
Well, the team has already been punished by the fact that the technically poorly played ball will not come to the ideal position for the attacker, so we allow the players to win a point with their action and not with a break and a referee’s decision.
Referees in volleyball today cannot have much influence on the result due to the use of the challenge system, but we should make their job easier by abolishing any technically foul ball. Not all referees have the same criteria for this situation and their decisions cause confusion among players and spectators and many times they can influence the final outcome. And I don’t blame them, they just try to follow the rule. In my opinion an illogical rule.
Volleyball should be understandable for all spectators, including my old aunt who watches the game because of me, and even more reasonable for everyone who wants to play for their enjoyment and to attract them with simple rules to be a part of a big volleyball family as recreationists, fans or future players,” writes Igor Kolakovic.
What’s your opinion on this matter?
————————————————————————————————-
Since you are here…
…we have a small favor to ask. WorldofVolley is one of the most popular volleyball websites in the world that provides many volleyball news daily. We are covering many worldwide competitions, trying to inform all of our fans by publishing breaking news.
Since we want to keep our future much secure, consider this donate button as a way to support our work and to help us grow.
THANK YOU!